QuickMail vs Woodpecker
Both of these allow unlimited sending accounts and both target agencies, which makes them natural rivals. They part company on pricing philosophy: QuickMail charges a flat monthly fee with published volume tiers; Woodpecker charges per contacted prospect, from $35/mo for the first 500.
QuickMail
Cold email built around inbox rotation, aimed squarely at agencies.
Woodpecker
Usage-based cold email priced on contacted prospects, with unlimited mailboxes.
| Feature | QuickMail | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Starting price | $49/momonthly billing; no annual rate published | $35/mousage-based: $35/mo for 500 contacted prospects ($7.00 per 100) |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Email accounts | Unlimited senders, all plans | Unlimited |
| Warmup included | Free AutoWarmer (MailFlow), all plans | Included with paid usage, more as add-ons |
| Monthly emails | 5,000 (Starter) → 500,000 (Agency) | — |
| Uploaded contacts | 1,000 (Starter) → 100,000 (Agency) | — |
| Inbox rotation | Yes | — |
| Multichannel | LinkedIn + email | LinkedIn (paid add-on), manual calls/SMS |
| Team members | — | Unlimited |
| Entry tier | — | 500 prospects — 8,000 emails/mo, 2,000 stored |
Hands-on field test
In progressWe plan to run identical 200-contact campaigns from freshly warmed mailboxes on each platform (same copy, same sending window, same domains) and measure inbox-placement rate via seed tests, plus bounce and reply rates. Until that runs we quote no deliverability figures.
The verdict
Woodpecker is the better fit for uneven volume — $35/mo for 500 contacted prospects, unlimited mailboxes and team members throughout, and a bill that scales with who you actually contact. QuickMail is the more predictable bill and the more complete deliverability package, bundling warmup and inbox rotation on every plan. QuickMail also publishes no annual discount, so there is no way to reduce it by committing.
Choose QuickMail if you want a forecastable monthly cost and rotation plus warmup handled for you. Choose Woodpecker if you are testing, your volume is seasonal, or you want unlimited mailboxes and seats at no cost first.
QuickMail vs Woodpecker: FAQs
- Which is cheaper to start?
- Woodpecker, at $35/mo for 500 contacted prospects against QuickMail's $49/mo — and its trial needs no card where QuickMail's does. NOTE: we previously recorded a standing free tier here. As of 2026-08-11 the vendor no longer shows one — the prospect selector starts at 500 and the page sells a 14-day trial instead.
- Do both allow unlimited mailboxes?
- Yes, and Woodpecker allows unlimited team members too, at every usage level. QuickMail's unlimited sending accounts apply on all three paid plans.
- Which has better agency support?
- Both aim at agencies from different angles. QuickMail bundles inbox rotation and warmup across client mailboxes on every plan. Woodpecker offers an agency panel, but as a paid add-on rather than a built-in tier.
- How predictable is the cost?
- QuickMail is a flat monthly fee with published send and contact limits per tier. Woodpecker bills per contacted prospect — $35/mo for 500, at $7.00 per 100 — so the bill tracks volume rather than sitting flat.
Comparing more than two?
Put QuickMail, Woodpecker and up to two others side by side on price, mailboxes, warmup and trials.
Open the comparison table →