Does either send email?

Snov does — sequences and warmup are included in the same subscription. Lusha is data only. That is the main structural difference between them.

How do the free options compare?

Lusha gives 40 credits a month with no credit card. Snov's free trial tier includes 50 credits, 100 recipients and a warmup slot — the warmup slot in particular is unusual to find at no cost.

Snov is $39/mo monthly or $29.25/mo annually, both now verified. Lusha lists $49.90/mo billed annually, its monthly rate still unconfirmed. On annual terms Snov is meaningfully cheaper.

How do the credit models differ?

Snov's credits are shared between finding and sending, so heavy prospecting eats into sending headroom. Lusha's are data-only and granted upfront annually, which is simpler but less forgiving of uneven months.

Lusha vs Snov.io

Both compete at the cheap end of the lead-data market and both have free tiers, but they are shaped differently: Snov bundles sending and warmup alongside its data, while Lusha does data only and expects you to have a platform already.

Lusha

B2B contact data with a real free tier, priced per credit rather than per lookup.

4.2Free tier

Visit Lusha

Snov.io

Lead database, email finder and sending in one, at the low end of the market.

4.2Free tier

Visit Snov.io

Feature	Lusha	Snov.io
Rating	4.2	4.2
Starting price	$49.9/momonthly billing; same $49.90 list rate billed yearly, cut to $37.45 by a Summer Sale promotion still running 2026-08-25	$39/momonthly billing; $29.25/mo billed annually
Free trial	Yes	Yes
Free tier	40 credits/month, no card	50 credits, 100 recipients
Credits	4,800/yr (Starter) → 40,800/yr (Premium)	1,000 (Starter) → 200,000+ (Ultra)
Seats included	1 (Starter) → 5 (Premium)	—
Credit delivery	Granted upfront	—
Team seats	—	Unlimited, all plans
Email warmup	—	3 slots (Starter), unlimited on Pro
Email sending	—	Included
Recipients	—	5,000 (Starter) → 400,000+ (Ultra)

Hands-on field test

In progress

For lead-data tools we plan to run a fixed list of 200 known-good contacts through each product and measure match rate, bounce rate on verified addresses, and cost per valid contact. Until measured, we publish no accuracy figures.

The verdict

Snov is the better value if you want one subscription covering finding, verification, sending and warmup — that consolidation genuinely removes a second purchase. Lusha is the better pure data tool, with a cleaner credit model and a free tier that needs no card. The deciding question is whether you already own a sending platform: if you do, Snov's bundled sending is capability you are paying for twice.

Choose Lusha if you already have a sending platform and want focused, well-organised contact data. Choose Snov.io if you want data and sending in one cheap subscription rather than assembling a stack.

Visit Lusha Visit Snov.io

Lusha vs Snov.io: FAQs

Does either send email?: Snov does — sequences and warmup are included in the same subscription. Lusha is data only. That is the main structural difference between them.
How do the free options compare?: Lusha gives 40 credits a month with no credit card. Snov's free trial tier includes 50 credits, 100 recipients and a warmup slot — the warmup slot in particular is unusual to find at no cost.
Which is cheaper?: Snov is $39/mo monthly or $29.25/mo annually, both now verified. Lusha lists $49.90/mo billed annually, its monthly rate still unconfirmed. On annual terms Snov is meaningfully cheaper.
How do the credit models differ?: Snov's credits are shared between finding and sending, so heavy prospecting eats into sending headroom. Lusha's are data-only and granted upfront annually, which is simpler but less forgiving of uneven months.

Comparing more than two?

Put Lusha, Snov.io and up to two others side by side on price, mailboxes, warmup and trials.

Open the comparison table →