Lemlist vs QuickMail
Lemlist and QuickMail both do email plus LinkedIn, which makes them look like alternatives. They differ in what else they optimise: Lemlist adds personalisation and a 650M+ lead database, QuickMail adds unlimited sending accounts and inbox rotation. One is a sales engagement platform, the other a deliverability platform.
Lemlist
Multichannel outreach with best-in-class personalisation and a built-in lead database.
QuickMail
Cold email built around inbox rotation, aimed squarely at agencies.
| Feature | Lemlist | QuickMail |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Starting price | $69/momonthly billing; $55/mo billed annually | $49/momonthly billing; no annual rate published |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Email accounts | Unlimited (Email plan); 5 senders/user (Multichannel) | Unlimited senders, all plans |
| Warmup included | Add-on (lemwarm) | Free AutoWarmer (MailFlow), all plans |
| Unified inbox | Yes | — |
| Multichannel | LinkedIn, calls, SMS | LinkedIn + email |
| Lead database | 650M+ | — |
| Monthly emails | — | 5,000 (Starter) → 500,000 (Agency) |
| Uploaded contacts | — | 1,000 (Starter) → 100,000 (Agency) |
| Inbox rotation | — | Yes |
Hands-on field test
In progressWe plan to run identical 200-contact campaigns from freshly warmed mailboxes on each platform (same copy, same sending window, same domains) and measure inbox-placement rate via seed tests, plus bounce and reply rates. Until that runs we quote no deliverability figures.
The verdict
QuickMail is the better choice if volume and deliverability are the constraint — inbox rotation across its sending accounts and warmup included, against warmup sold as a paid add-on by Lemlist. Both allow unlimited senders on their entry plans, so the difference is rotation and bundled warmup rather than mailbox count. Lemlist is the better choice if relevance is the constraint, with stronger personalisation and a built-in database that replaces a separate data subscription. Lemlist is also $69 to QuickMail's $49, and priced per user on multichannel.
Choose Lemlist if your outbound wins on personalisation, and a bundled lead database saves you a separate purchase. Choose QuickMail if you need to send from many mailboxes with rotation and warmup handled, and per-user pricing does not suit you.
Lemlist vs QuickMail: FAQs
- How many mailboxes does each allow?
- Both are unlimited for email at the entry tier: QuickMail on every plan, Lemlist on its Email plan. Lemlist's Multichannel plan allocates 5 senders per user, so growing mailbox count there means adding users. QuickMail's real edge is automatic rotation across those accounts, not the count itself.
- Is warmup included in either?
- QuickMail includes a free AutoWarmer on all plans. On Lemlist, warmup is a paid add-on (lemwarm), which is worth adding to the sticker price when comparing.
- Do both do LinkedIn?
- Yes. Lemlist covers email, LinkedIn, calls and SMS in one sequence builder. QuickMail supports LinkedIn plus email. Lemlist covers more channels; QuickMail covers more mailboxes.
- What is the price difference?
- Lemlist is $69/mo monthly ($55 billed annually) and per user on multichannel. QuickMail is $49/mo with no annual rate published. Lemlist is the more expensive of the two on every basis.
Comparing more than two?
Put Lemlist, QuickMail and up to two others side by side on price, mailboxes, warmup and trials.
Open the comparison table →